Tesla Q2 2026: Revenue Up, Trust Split
July 23, 2026 · n=2,000 U.S. adults · fielded in ~3.3 minutes
Headline findings
71.7%
say Musk is asking investors to fund a bet that isn't proven yet — top answer after the earnings headline.
85.1%
probably or definitely would not buy a Tesla in the next two years (78.7% probably not, 6.4% definitely not).
39%
say Elon Musk's public profile makes them view Tesla a lot more negatively; another 54% say it colors their view some.
Questions · frozen toplines
Q1
“After Tesla's latest earnings — higher revenue but lower profits and heavy spending on robotaxi and AI — which comes closest to your view?”
The spending is worth it if Tesla wins on robotaxi and AI
5.8%
Sales recovery is good, but the profit drop is a real warning sign
16.9%
Musk is asking investors to fund a bet that isn't proven yet
71.7%
I don't follow Tesla closely enough to say
1.9%
Tesla is already in trouble regardless of this quarter
3.7%
Q2
“Would you consider buying a Tesla vehicle in the next two years?”
Definitely yes
6.4%
Probably yes
7.4%
Probably not
78.7%
Definitely not
6.4%
Not sure / don't need a car
1.1%
13.8% positive purchase intent (definitely + probably yes). Read as directional brand health, not a sales forecast.
Q3
“How much does Elon Musk's public profile affect your view of Tesla as a company?”
A lot — it makes me view Tesla more negatively
39.0%
Some — it colors my view but the product still matters most
54.4%
Some — it makes me view Tesla more positively
2.3%
Not much — I judge the cars and services on their own
1.4%
Not sure
2.9%
93% say Musk's profile affects their view at least some — almost always negatively or with mixed coloring.
Methodology
Panel
U.S. national ACS-weighted panel
Sample
n=2,000
Fielded
July 23, 2026, ~9:30–9:34 AM ET
Model
Lewis v17 · dated persona + Q2 earnings news context
Reactive LinkedIn pulse tied to Q2 earnings and EV brand-trust coverage. Not investment advice. No human benchmark to grade against.
Full data (JSON) →Read before citing
Synthetic panel — not a probability sample, and no humans were interviewed. Pulses are short reactive reads; cite with attribution to The Lewsearch Report.