Dot map of the United States. Hover or tap a respondent to open a short preview.

Research with simulated people.Then check our work.

Test messages, screen concepts, and explore customer perspectives with a panel of 650,000 census-grounded simulated Americans. Compare our results with human research through public benchmarks, graded forecasts, or your own Blind Challenge.

Have a completed study? Your first qualified Blind Challenge is free.

From the public 50-state file: a hit, a typical result, and a miss.

hitMAE 1.5 pp

How concerned, if at all, are you personally about the price of food and consumer goods?

UT/Texas Politics Project · Texas · June 2026 · n=1,200 registered voters

Shares in % · Miss and MAE in percentage points
OptionOursPollMiss
Very concerned63.265.01.8
Somewhat concerned26.627.00.4
Not too concerned4.56.01.5
Not at all concerned2.81.01.8
Don't know2.81.01.8
Closer than 97% of the 1,521 questions.All 1,521 are public →

Published in

Quirk's

Listed on

GreenbookInsight Platforms

MAE is the average miss in percentage points, not percent accuracy. This retrospective benchmark compares questions with published poll toplines, not independent poll fieldings. It does not validate open-ended interviews or predict accuracy on your next study. The lowest-error 80% (1,216 questions, selected after scoring) averaged 7.07 points →

The Blind Challenge

You have the answers. We don't.

Bring a human study you already fielded. We run the agreed questions before we see your results, and you compare the two on your own terms.

  1. 1You send the questionnaire and the audience. You keep the results.
  2. 2We field it on simulated respondents and lock our numbers before delivery.
  3. 3You open your study and grade us, question by question.

Your first qualified U.S. consumer Blind Challenge is free. No purchase required.

Trackers and multi-wave studies are scoped as Concierge or Enterprise on the call. How sample boosting works →

Scored after the freeze

NRF back-to-school, 2026

  • n = 6,500 simulated Americans
  • Frozen July 7
  • NRF published July 14

Mean K-12 spend within 1%

Read the scorecard →

Pew Research Center · September 30, 2026

“AI polling is not a replacement for rigorously surveying real humans.”
Pew's AI respondents, built from each panelist's profile, missed by 12 points on average across nearly 300 questions. We agree with the conclusion. The Blind Challenge is how you find out, on your own questions, where a synthetic panel earns a place in your workflow.
Read Pew's study ↗ (opens in a new tab)

What you can run

Six ways to ask 650,000 people.

Every study comes back with a receipt: what was asked, who answered, and how much weight the result can carry. One study asks up to 10,000 respondents.

PANEL STUDY · TEXAS · n=500 · Q1 OF 3

01 / 06

Would you switch insurers to save $30 a month?

Yes41%
Depends on coverage37%
No22%

Party D 47 · R 34 · I 43

Age 18-34 52 · 35-54 41 · 55+ 31

RECEIPT · 3 QUESTIONS · 500 RESPONDENTS · TWO MEMOS · PDF

How it works →
Illustrative output · simulated respondents

Multiple-choice questions to up to 10,000 census-grounded respondents. Toplines, crosstabs, and quotes in about 15 minutes.

You get

Toplines, crosstabs, quotes, two analyst memos, PDF

Panel studies →

Where it fits

Between a panel and a prompt.

Human fieldwork is the standard of record. A frontier model can estimate a national split in seconds. Lewsearch sits between them: a standing panel you can field in minutes, cut any way, re-ask next month, and check against a public record.

Who answers
Human panelRecruited people
Asking a chatbotOne model, prompted for an answer
Lewsearch650,000 simulated Americans built from census microdata, answering through Lewis, our own survey model
Turnaround
Human panelDays to weeks
Asking a chatbotSeconds
LewsearchAbout 15 minutes for a panel study
What comes back
Human panelRespondent-level data
Asking a chatbotA distribution or a summary
LewsearchRespondent-level records, toplines, crosstabs, verbatims, and a client-ready PDF
Calibration
Human panelWeighting to known totals
Asking a chatbotNone by default
LewsearchCalibration against published survey data; custom calibration to your past studies scoped on Enterprise
Crosstabs
Human panelAdd up to the total
Asking a chatbotEach cut is a separate prompt
LewsearchEvery cut comes from the same respondents and adds up to the total
The next wave
Human panelRe-recruit as panels churn
Asking a chatbotStarts from scratch
LewsearchThe same respondents, with memory of earlier waves
Your customers
Human panelScreeners and quotas
Asking a chatbotA description in the prompt
LewsearchA panel built from your customer data, in your own workspace, scored on your past studies
Error record
Human panelKnown sampling error
Asking a chatbotRarely published
Lewsearch1,521 scored questions in a public file, and forecasts graded in public
Your data
Human panelCovered by the vendor contract
Asking a chatbotSent to a model provider
LewsearchEnterprise workloads make no external model API calls

Use human fieldwork when the sample itself is the deliverable: a tracker of record, a regulatory claim, a number a journalist will print. Use Lewsearch before and beside it, to screen options, pre-test a questionnaire, explore segments, and fill cells that are expensive to recruit.

The Lewsearch Report

We call it before the number comes out.

Each Issue freezes a forecast before the official figure is published, then grades it in public against a rule set in advance. The misses stay up.

  • 3 wins
  • 1 miss
  • 3 awaiting a grade
Every Lewsearch Report forecast, with the official figure and the grade
Issue 07Deloitte holiday survey: average planned spend, 2026

Win if $1,509 to $1,591

Our call$1,589OfficialDue mid-OctoberAwaiting grade
Issue 06NY Fed household spending growth, August

Inside the band; April's 4.8 was closer

Our call4.9Official4.7Miss
Issue 05Michigan consumer sentiment, September preliminary

Second guess; the first, 55.4, missed

Our call52.1Official47.8Win
Issue 04225 public-opinion questions for 2026–27Our call225 frozenOfficialResolves Jan 8, 2027Awaiting grade
Issue 03Five 2026 Senate racesOur call5 marginsOfficialResolves Nov 3, 2026Awaiting grade
Issue 02Prince George's County data-center pauseOur call94.9% supportOfficialPassed July 7Win
Issue 01NRF back-to-school spend per K-12 household

Two frozen runs, both within 1%. Two timing questions were instrument mismatches

Our call$857 / $870Official$864Win

For insights teams

Built on your customers. Scored on your history.

Enterprise gives your team a standing synthetic panel of your own market: fit to your customers, calibrated to studies you already ran, run privately, and wired into the tools you already use.

Your population

We build the panel to match the people you actually survey: your customers, your segments, your cells, from your CRM, loyalty, or sample files. On one Vermont question, matching the study's age, sex, party, and education cut the miss from 20.4 points to 9.5.

The Vermont comparison →

Calibrated to your history

We scope calibration around the studies and trackers your team already trusts, then evaluate the agreed questions in a blind replay and report the miss question by question.

How the blind replay works →

Your own workspace

We build a self-serve workspace for your team: your audiences, your question library, your brand. Analysts launch studies themselves, and our researchers stay on call.

The platform →

Inside your stack

Toplines, crosstabs, respondent-level files, verbatims, and client-ready PDFs. A REST API and MCP access put the panel inside your own tools, dashboards, and AI assistants.

The research API →

Private by design

Each Enterprise deployment is a custom build that runs on Lewis, our own survey model, with no external model API calls. A dedicated, physically separate instance can be included.

Enterprise details →

Researchers on call

When a question needs a full instrument, our team designs it, runs the study, and writes the report, so your team gets an answer as well as a dataset.

Concierge research →

How teams start

  1. 01Free

    Blind Challenge

    Bring a U.S. consumer study you already ran. We predict it blind and you grade the result.

  2. 028 weeks

    Pilot

    Your questions, your audience, calibrated to your past studies. It rolls straight into the annual engagement.

  3. 03Annual

    Enterprise

    A standing, calibrated panel of your market, your own workspace, and studies whenever your team needs them.

Questions

What research teams ask first.

Something else? Email jeffrey@lewsearch.com or read the methodology.

What is Lewsearch?

A synthetic research company. Lewsearch keeps a panel of 650,000 simulated Americans built from census microdata, each with its own beliefs and a memory of what it has been asked. Research teams use it for panel studies, message tests, focus groups, and digital-twin interviews, and can check every result against a public record of scored questions and graded forecasts.

Are these real people?

No. They are simulated respondents built from census microdata, and every report says so on the cover. What we publish is how closely their aggregate answers track real polls, question by question, in a public file.

How accurate is this?

7.07-point average miss on the best 80% of 1,521 scored questions (1,216 retained). 10.02 points across every scored question. MAE is the average miss in percentage points against published poll toplines, on calibrated panels with 200 simulated respondents per question. A narrower April test on 5 places with 10,000 respondents scored 7.47 points on 404 non-electoral questions. A strict held-out set sourced after the model froze scored 9.97 points on non-electoral items. Every scored question in the 50-state benchmark is in the public file.

See the error, question by question →
How is this different from asking ChatGPT?

A frontier model asked for a national split can come close on well-polled questions. Lewsearch adds what a research team needs beyond a topline: respondent-level records you can cut into crosstabs that add up to the total, the same respondents re-asked across waves, audiences fit to your customers and scored on your own past studies, a public record of every scored question and graded forecast, and Enterprise workloads with no external model API calls.

Can you build an audience from our customers?

Yes. We build a panel from your customer profile, your CRM or loyalty file, or the samples from your past studies. We calibrate it to studies you already fielded and report the miss question by question before you rely on it. Your team gets its own workspace for those audiences, with API and MCP access, and Enterprise workloads make no external model API calls.

Enterprise →
When should I not use this?

When the sample itself is the deliverable: litigation, regulatory filings, a tracker of record, or a number a journalist will print. Use Lewsearch before and beside that fieldwork: to screen options, pre-test a questionnaire, explore segments, and fill cells that are expensive to recruit.

What does it cost?

Pricing is scoped to your audiences and study volume on a 30-minute call with the team. Your first qualified U.S. consumer Blind Challenge is free. Enterprise teams start with an 8-week pilot on their own questions, which rolls into an annual engagement.

Book a call →

Bring us a question you already know the answer to.

Thirty minutes with the team. Bring a questionnaire, a study you already ran, or a decision due this quarter.

The Lewsearch Report

New issues, scorecards, methodology updates. Free, no spam.